Specify Books Supposing A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22)
Original Title: | La Femme de trente ans |
ISBN: | 1406951277 (ISBN13: 9781406951271) |
Series: | La Comédie Humaine #22 |
Honoré de Balzac
Audiobook | Pages: 146 pages Rating: 3.48 | 3468 Users | 217 Reviews
Representaion Toward Books A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22)
Our heroine Julie is attending with her ailing father one of Napoleon’s reviews of his troops. It is after the debacle in Russia, but the Old Guard still knows how to put on a show. The lovely young girl is dazzled by Colonel Victor d’Aiglemont, a dashing young adjutant who gallops by. The father notices Julie’s fascination and shakes his head anxiously, knowing that the young man is unworthy of her.
Point Epithetical Books A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22)
Title | : | A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22) |
Author | : | Honoré de Balzac |
Book Format | : | Audiobook |
Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 146 pages |
Published | : | 2006 by Hard Press (first published 1834) |
Categories | : | Classics. Fiction. European Literature. French Literature. Cultural. France. Literature. 19th Century. Novels |
Rating Epithetical Books A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22)
Ratings: 3.48 From 3468 Users | 217 ReviewsAppraise Epithetical Books A Woman Of Thirty (La Comédie Humaine #22)
The elaborate story between Eugenia Grandet and Father Goriot, A Woman Of Thirty (1834) is a work of complex genesis.Under the idea of a composition originally held six-episode portraits of the same heroine presented under different names - Honoré de Balzac will in turn said, 'six frames between which it is composed a story'.At the same time as a sociologist, physiologist and moralist, Balzac extends some of the key stages of Aiglemont's marquee life which fails to reconcile his wife, mother andIt`s not a textbook describing life after 30. It`s actually a very comprising novel in 6 parts describing Julie`s life, the main character, who makes incorrect choices, ruins her life and unfortunately ruins the life of her children as well. Not all parts are easy to read and I think everyone will agree that the first part is melodramatic and the author is really boring with his interminable and exaggerated descriptions.However, the story is not bad but reading so many pages about a womans
This is a remarkably uneven piece of literature. On one hand, it focuses on the details of the inner life of a woman with a degree of psychological depth that is impressive. On the other hand, it collapses into nothing short of misogny fairly frequently and about two thirds into the narrative, takes a turn for the romanesque that stretches believability considerably. The one common point that ties everything together is a bounty of expressive power displayed both in vivid descriptions of the

Books like this make me praise the right to get divorced. Luckily in the modern Western world the problems raised in the book are mostly outdated. The vain pride Julie takes into being submitted to society ways and her toxic relationship with the others and herself is all but frustrating. Her mental sufferings or rather diagnosis could be cured by a bit of work! A surprising and fairly engaging bit in the book is full of strange adventures best thought through a mist of opium.Tu seras où
Our protagonist is named Julie d'Aiglemont. Against her father's advice, she marries Victor d'Aiglemont and soon realizes that the men she fell in love with is unable to respond to her desires. And from that moment, Julie doesn't seem capable of being happy. Every glimpse of happiness ends up in tragedy. The truth is: even though she's the main character, I didn't felt connected to her. However, Helena conquered my heart; her pure and vulnerable spirit was truly unexpected, mainly because she
Human Comedy #19.Oh Balzac, youre such a frustrating writer. When youre good, youre very very good, but when youre bad youre horrid. And this book contains both aspects.This is one of his philosophical portraits. Which means pages and pages of descriptions of internal life; telling us what someones like rather than showing us. And that is very irritating. For example, were told how witty, clever and captivating Mme dAiglemont is, but never shown any examples of this. Were told how awful the
Disappointingly, I didn't enjoy this book as much as I thought I would. A lot of times I thought I was reading a book by a female author which is not something negative about the book, of course. It's just I find this very interesting. I kept looking the author's name. There was a sensitive female touch in a lot of parts. Especially in describing. This is, actually, one of the few cool and good things about the book.Oddly enough, the only engrossing parts of the book were either with that
0 Comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.